Impressive details why isn’t the tiger the king of the jungle instead of the lion?

The tigers are bigger than lions but, unlike lions who actually live in the jungle.

Tigers are not considered the “king of the jungle” for a few reasons. First, tigers do not actually live in the jungle – they are found primarily in forested areas and grasslands in Asia. Lions, on the other hand, are found in grasslands and savannas in Africa.

Secondly, the title of “king of the jungle” has more to do with cultural associations and symbolism than with actual biological traits or behavior. Lions have long been associated with royalty, strength, and power in many cultures, and this association has helped to establish them as the symbolic “king of the jungle” in popular imagination.

Finally, while tigers are certainly powerful and impressive predators, they do not have the same social structure or cultural significance as lions. Lions are known for their social behavior, with males forming coalitions and females working together to hunt and care for younger ones. This social structure has helped to make lions a popular and iconic symbol of strength and power.

In summary, while tigers are certainly impressive animals, they are not considered the “king of the jungle” due to a combination of cultural associations, social behavior, and habitat. Lions have established themselves as the symbolic “king of the jungle” due to their cultural significance, social structure, and association with royalty and power.

Source: Quora.com